By
Olusola O. Muhammad
Wednesday, 12/29/04 18:01
During
the early nineteen-eighties living, working and growing up
in London was for me a life of penury and making attempts
to improve my lot in life. A source of comfort during that
period was imaging a better life daily.
I
imaged an environment where money was printed, coined and
distributed and being in total control of its management.
This was not for some vain desire, as I recall being over
the City of London and South London observing both economic
realities. Always working but not necessarily fulfilling my
potential I eventually snapped out of my dream world and decided
that the best way to improve my life was via the process of
education, which I abandoned in the 6th form of my school
days.
I
began studying business studies and seriously considered accountancy
and banking as career options. I began reading the Financial
Times and Guardian newspapers to serve my research objectives
and as general reading material.
The
FT highlighted for me the ‘plight’ of Africa and
the economic injustice I saw being perpetrated against her
by the West. The instruments of economic destruction being
used were the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World
Bank, which has since been confirmed in a Report
released by the IMF at the time of the world’s outcry
against the ‘9/11’ events in America.
Several
years later on 26th February 1995 I listened to a lecture
on International Banking, which exposed the wickedness of
the International Banking fraternity. Their involvement in
the financing of wars, the destabilising of nations and most
importantly I learnt about the Banking Dynasty that controls
the Banks of England, Italy, France, Germany and Austria that
are supposed to be owned by their respective governments but
are in fact private banking institutions. That banking dynasty
is known as the ‘Rothschild’s’.
About
eight hours after the lecture, here in the UK the City of
London’s oldest ‘Merchant’ Bank and Banker
to the Queen of England, Barings Bank, was declared as, “near
collapse in [a] £400 million loss.” Nick Leeson
the financial trader working for Barings Bank in the Far East
was blamed for the bank’s collapse. The acclaimed book
quoted during the lecture was ‘None Dare Call It Conspiracy,’
by Gary Allen and Larry Abraham.
The
information was mind-blowing. The Rothschild’s, Warburg’s,
Loeb and Kuhn’s, Rockefellers, Dupont’s and J
P Morgan Bank’s were identified as being involved in
the financing of wars for greed and profit at the expense
of human life. The most ‘damming revelation’ was
that some of these bankers who professed to be ‘Jews’,
financed Hitler, and also funded both protagonists in the
American War for Independence.
My
‘banking’ thoughts bore fruit in a most unexpected
way in
November 2002 whilst
working for ‘Brucar’ (Brunel.com). I spent half
a day with Mr. Rothschild, of N. M. Rothschild Bank (UK),
him sitting in the back of my car taking him around London.
A most curious destination was The ‘Whites’
‘gentlemen’s’ club on St James’s street,
just off Piccadilly in the West End.
What
is so important about the Rothschild Family and its Banking
Empire? This banking dynasty has weaved its way into the corridors
of governments and taken control of them, such that people
talk of Africa as the ‘stain on the conscience of the
world’ without really knowing the handicap placed on
her by International banks and other financial institutions.
Some
of Rothschild’s Bank activities include financing “the
English armies of Wellington in Spain and France, enabled
Britain to buy into the Suez Canal, arranged the first Prussian
bond, pioneered the development of Russian oilfields”
and in part financed Cecil Rhodes who murdered and pillaged
his way across Southern Africa in the name of gold and diamonds,
leaving today’s legacy of the ‘De Beers Mining
Company’”.
In
Egypt during the 1860’s - 1870’s the burden of
repaying bank loans at exorbitant rates of interest from European
banks, for national infrastructure projects, began to take
their toll on the Egyptian Government. Today governments get
loans from the (IMF) and the Egyptian experience persists.
As a result of the lean financial times the Khedive's (President)
government of Egypt experienced, he used the last remaining
‘asset,’ of the country – its shares in
the Suez Canal – to raise a loan for the country’s
continued economic prosperity.
Egypt
approached the French for a loan, news of which got through
to the British government and the offices of Rothschild at
the same time. Disraeli the then prime minister of Britain
and Lionel Rothschild were very good friends and were “discussing
the Egyptian situation,” primarily because Britain needed
to secure the strategic route through the Suez Canal to its
Indian, Australian, New Zealand and African colonies instead
of having to traverse the continent of Africa making journey
times longer.
Disraeli
“asked Rothschild for the four million” needed
to buy the Egyptian shares and after presenting the idea to
the Cabinet and without “approach to Parliament to vote
the necessary funds,” terms were accepted from Rothschild
for “£4 million at 5 per cent interest and two
and a half percent commission.
“Seven-sixteenths
of the whole” Egyptian Suez Canal shares were thus acquired
for Britain on November 24, 1875 to the despair and disgust
of the Khedive of Egypt and his people who saw the move as
a destruction of their national sovereignty and independence.
In
1997, when the Labour Party was voted in, to the euphoric
delight of many, the ‘Bank of England’ was immediately
privatised. The bank was formally established in 1694 for
the purpose of war by a “cunning scheme to let the cash-strapped
government of the time…borrow from the country’s
rich landowners at good rates of interest. The company would
be known as the Company of the Bank of England…and so
the beast that spawned modern capitalism, with the power to
bring down governments, was born”. Many of the banks
investors were involved in the ‘Slave Trade’.
Why
was the bank privatised? A government should be in total control
of the printing and distribution of its ‘money’
supply and not have economic and monetary policy affected
by the ebb and flow of ‘interest rates’ currently
presided over by a Committee of persons from International
banking institutions who determine the economic reality of
this nation.
As
this article gets to the desks of the ‘landscape’
designers of the events of history and the protectors of the
status quo, their knives will be sharpened and the armour
of wrath will be put on. But be reminded, surly the pen is
mightier than the sword and it was David as small as he was
who brought down Goliath!
Watch
this space for more, god-willing. |